Subject: LL8 routing considerations

From: "Philip Nye" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:55:05 -0000

I accept the principle and support the text suggested by Robert Elz:

Routing Protocols

The link local address block (169.254/16) MUST NOT be
included as a reachable prefix in any dynamic routing protocol.
Subnets of that address block (which should not exist - see sect N.M)
MUST NOT be included either.