Subject: RE: zc protocol scalability

From: "Hattig, Myron" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 10:37:38 -0700

As the draft and wg charter state, we are only concerned with
four protocol areas: ip host config, name to ip addr resolution,
ip multicast addr alloc, and service discovery. So the answer
to your question is NO; managing devices and QoS are not within
scope. 

-myron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Holdrege [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2000 8:11 PM
> To: Hattig, Myron
> Cc: [email-masked]'
> Subject: Re: zc protocol scalability
> 
> 
> Are managing ZC devices and networks within scope? I expect 
> scalability 
> will be important in that respect. Ditto for applying QoS 
> controls on ZC 
> networks.
> 
> 
> At 12:37 PM 4/24/00 -0700, Hattig, Myron wrote:
> >Just trying to update the zc requirements draft from the meeting in
> >Adelaide. Someone requested that scalability requirements be 
> placed up from
> >in the document and others agreed. Please comment on the 
> following text I am
> >proposing becomes section 1.3.4 in the req. doc.
> >
> >----------
> >
> >1.3.4   Scalability
> >
> >Scalability is not of great concern for zeroconf protocols 
> because it is
> >more likely that a zeroconf protocol will transition to a 
> non-zeroconf
> >protocol before scalability becomes an issue. For this 
> reason, this document
> >mentions little of scalability requirements.
> >
> >----------
> >
> >-myron
> 
>