Subject: [xml2rfc-dev] Problem compiling with the xml beta version - Fwd: special purpose labels

From: Loa Andersson <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 23:43:06 +0100

Folks,

I've included two files

- draft-kompella-mpls-special-purpose-labels-02.xml
- draft-kompella-mpls-special-purpose-labels-02.txt

We are updating a number of RFCs, and uses the "updates"
element in the RFC-header.

Compiling with the beta version gives us a long long row
that disappears way beyond the right hand side of the
the file as shown in the .txt file.

The long row also prevents uploading with the submit tool.

Using the old xml2rfc version works just fine.

/Loa

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: special purpose labels
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:28:02 -0400
From: Kireeti Kompella <[email-masked]>
To: Loa Andersson <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked] Farrel" 
<[email-masked]>
CC: Kireeti Kompella <[email-masked]>

(resending -- correct address for Adrian)

Sat with Loa, hammered out the following changes:
0) changed draft title, affiliations of Loa and me.
1) add a section describing RFCs updated.
2) added clarification that the extension label only affects the 
immediately following label.
3) clarified IANA:
	- set aside the existing special purpose labels in the extended space
	- if a new special purpose label in the old space is defined, it MUST 
say if it needs to be reserved in the extended space as well

Question: should there be verbiage that new special purpose labels 
should only be allocated from the old space if they are processed in the 
data plane?

Kireeti