Subject: [websec] Fwd: Re: [Geopriv] "Do not track" header field

From: Peter Saint-Andre <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 07:53:38 -0700

FYI.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] "Do not track" header field
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:47:17 +0000
From: Alissa Cooper <[email-masked]>
To: Richard L. Barnes <[email-masked]>
CC: [email-masked] <[email-masked]>, Thomson,	Martin
<[email-masked]>

And I've been talking to Sid at Mozilla about getting a draft ready
before IETF 80.

On Jan 24, 2011, at 9:49 PM, Richard L. Barnes wrote:

> If you look at the Bugzilla link, Julian has already suggested that  
> this go to WEBSEC for IETF approval and de-X-ification.
> --Richard
>
>
> On Jan 24, 2011, at 4:45 PM, Thomson, Martin wrote:
>
>> They should really drop the X-...
>>
>> On 2011-01-25 at 08:41:41, Richard L. Barnes wrote:
>>> This will likely come up on the WEBSEC list as well, but I thought  
>>> this
>>> might be interesting to GEOPRIV folks:
>>>
>>> Mozilla and Google Chrome are proposing to extend browsers to send a
>>> "do not track" HTTP header of the following form:
>>> X-Tracking-Choice: do-not-track
>>>
>>> This seems like another example of users sending along privacy
>>> preferences with their data, just like PIDF-LO privacy rules,  
>>> Creative
>>> Commons licenses, etc.
>>>
>>> References:
>>> <http://firstpersoncookie.wordpress.com/2011/01/23/more-choice-and-
>>> control-over-online-tracking/>
>>> <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628197>
>>> <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628198>
>>>
>>> --Richard
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv