Subject: [video-codec] VP.next or not ?

From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 04:29:25 +0000

I was originally under the impression that we would have an ID with VP.next proposal before the BOF. Then at the BOF, I was under the impression it would show up Real Soon. I'd like to see it before any charter goes to the ADs because if that work is going to some other SDO, then it means we are going to have two new codecs going forward instead of one which make all this a much more complicated decision for me.