Subject: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Oh dear, Another tracker defect?

From: Adrian Farrel <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 20:11:14 +0100

draft-ietf-roll-security-framework was in IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed 

A new version was posted, and I would have expected the state to automatically
transition to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup

But the I-D seems to be stuck in the previous state.

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-security-framework/history/

Thanks,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Levkowetz [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: 29 April 2011 14:52
> To: Emilio A. Sanchez Lopez
> Cc: 'Adrian Farrel'
> Subject: Fwd: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Tracker defect
> 
> Hi Emilio,
> 
> See the message below, and the page referred.  Could it be that drafts
> posted using the new submission tool don't re-set the time at which a
> draft will expire?
> 
> 
> Best,
> 
> 	Henrik
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Tracker defect
> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 23:52:54 +0100
> From: Adrian Farrel <[email-masked]>
> Reply-To: [email-masked]
> To: [email-masked]
> CC: [email-masked], [email-masked]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> An oddity.
> 
> Have a look at the history at
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-explicit-resource-control-
> bundle/history/
> 
> You'll see that a new revision was posted "just in time" but the dastardly
> tracker decided to time out the previous version and mark the whole thing
Dead.
> 
> Now the "current" version is the previous one.
> 
> Cheers,
> Adrian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development