Subject: rquirement: check fixes to errata [ was: [Techspec] New version o f mankin-pub-req available]

From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:34:07 +0100

Sect 3.15
- Do we want to add a potential requirement that the published checks if errata
  have been fixed when a new RFC obsoletes and older one (with errata)?

Bert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]On
> Behalf Of Stephen Hayes (TX/EUS)
> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 22:03
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [Techspec] New version of mankin-pub-req available
> 
> 
> The -02 version of the technical publication requirements is 
> available at 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mankin-pub-req-02.tx
t.  It is an extensive rewrite of the -01 version with an eye to taking a more systematic approach.  The new version is basically a laundry list of requirements (both current and potential) against a technical publisher.  The goal is to provide a framework in which we can decide what the IETF wants a technical publisher to do and what level of performance we want to see.

Comments eagerly awaited.

Stephen Hayes

_______________________________________________
Techspec mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec

_______________________________________________
Techspec mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec