Subject: [saag] SACM WG Report

From: Adam Montville <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 13:48:54 +0200

SACM met on Monday to discuss open issues on draft-coffin-sacm-nea-swid-patnc [1], draft-ietf-sacm-information-model [2], draft-ietf-sacm-requirements [3], and draft-ietf-sacm-terminology [4].

We will meet again on Friday to discuss draft-birkholz-sacm-coswid [5], and to begin discussing Selecting a Data Format for an Endpoint Information Data Model.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-coffin-sacm-nea-swid-patnc/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-coffin-sacm-nea-swid-patnc/>
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-information-model/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-information-model/>
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-requirements/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-requirements/>
[4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology/>
[5] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-birkholz-sacm-coswid/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-birkholz-sacm-coswid/>