Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Resetting Streams (#165)

From: Mike Bishop <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 12:26:50 -0700

Following the guidance about substantive discussion happening on the issue, not the PR: @martinthomson and @huitema have diverging opinions about whether DISINTEREST needs to convey a reason.  I'll note that it originally had the field, and there are still leftover references in the HTTP draft that tell you what error code to use, but the field isn't currently present.  If we decide that it doesn't need to convey a reason, we have some error codes to trim.

In the early response case, conveying a reason is superfluous, since the response conveys all the reason you need.  In the declined push case, it might be useful to convey something more precise on why you don't want the push (don't trust you for that origin, resource already in cache, etc.), but then again we might soon have an application-level way of cancelling a push that could communicate the same thing courtesy of @martinthomson.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/165#issuecomment-317528816