Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Restructuring the QUIC packet header (#406)

From: Mark Nottingham <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 23:14:02 -0700

Jana, all of those issues are either editorial or has-consensus. I don't think it's good to declare consensus on a specific PR, since that's effectively saying we have consensus on a set of bytes in the draft, rather than the ideas behind them.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/406#issuecomment-295113917