Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)

From: Martin Thomson <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 20:11:21 -0700

Relevant to this discussion: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-thomson-tls-record-limit - the same reasons for doing that apply here.  Interestingly, this would allow an endpoint to specify a limit lower than 1280 for encrypted packets, but I think that's OK.  (The degree to which we intend to support constrained implementations determines how relevant this feature might be.)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/383#issuecomment-295562888