Subject: [midcom] Market share of various types of NAT's

From: "Sanjoy Sen"<[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 12:13:46 -0600

All,

   I think somebody raised the question before, but does anybody have any
ball-park numbers for the market shares of the various NAT's. What're the
market shares of Symmetric, Full Cone, Port Restricted Cone and Restricted
Cone in each of the Small-Medium Enterprise, SOHO and Residential markets?
Or what's the market shares for Symmetric vs Cone types in each of these
markets?

Thanks,
Sanjoy

Nortel Networks

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Melinda Shore [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 9:06 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [midcom] Fwd: draft-ietf-midcom-requirements-04.txt
> 
> 
> To keep you posted on progress ...
> 
> >Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 21:00:44 -0500 (EST)
> >From: Scott  Bradner <[email-masked]>
> >To: [email-masked], [email-masked]
> >Subject: draft-ietf-midcom-requirements-04.txt
> >
> >
> >please share this with teh ID authors (and the mailing list 
> if you want to)
> >
> >the ID looks good but IETF rules require that there be a 
> section in RFCs 
> >titled "Security Considerations" -
> >
> >This can be done in this ID by having a Security 
> Considerations section that
> >says
> >   "The secrity requirements for a midcom protocol are 
> discissed in sec 2.3."
> >
> >since the ID has to be redone to fix the above please have 
> the references
> >section redone to split normative and non-normative 
> references - see the
> >RFC-Editor's web page for instructions.
> >
> >Scott
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> midcom mailing list
> [email-masked]
> http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom
>