Subject: Re: [lisp] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

From: Anton Smirnov <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 23:34:29 +0100

Hello Stephen,

    authors of the draft have just published -09 revision. In the new 
text we addressed comments you raised, in particular we deprecated 
RSA-SHA1 and made RSA-SHA256 as mandatory implementation algorithm.

---
Anton

On Thursday 27 October 2016 14:44, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-08: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-ddt/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> 6.4.1: RSA-SHA1 is not the right choice today, shouldn't
> this be RSA-SHA256?
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> - 6.4.1: Can you clarify what bits are signed? I'm not
> quite sure from the description given - you can have
> more than one signature but you say the the "entire
> record" is covered.
>
> - Section 8: Where's signature validation in the
> pseudo-code?
>
>