Subject: [httpwg/http-extensions] How does the CSP syntax fit into the header structure? (#388)

From: HTTP issue updates <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 09:26:09 -0700

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure-01?#appendix-A surveys the 723* RFCs but not, for example, https://www.w3.org/TR/CSP2/#content-security-policy-header-field. You probably should include that example of structured data in your analysis.

https://github.com/WICG/feature-policy/issues/78 proposes to extend the CSP format into a new non-CSP header. Should they be considering draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/388