Subject: [httpwg/http-extensions] clarify multi-103 behavior (#380)

From: HTTP issue updates <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 05:23:07 +0000 (UTC)

Clarify that the disappearance of a header field (that once existed in a 103 response) from the following 103 responses does not indicate the retraction of the expectation that the header field will be included in the final response.

closes #371 
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/380

-- Commit Summary --

  * clarify multi-103 behavior (based on the general rule that the absense of a header field in 103 is not a negative prediction

-- File Changes --

    M draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints.md (5)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/380.patch
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/380.diff

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/380