Subject: [httpwg/http-extensions] Clarify paragraph on requirements for alt-svc (#280)

From: HTTP issue updates <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:46:59 -0800

This was getting unwieldy.  Change it so that there are two musts and two supporting statements.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/280

-- Commit Summary --

  * Happy new year!
  * There was a long sentence here
  * the http-opportunistic response is acquired over authenticated connections (take 3)

-- File Changes --

    M draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-digest.md (2)
    M draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints.md (2)
    M draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-alone.md (2)
    M draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-prefixes.md (2)
    M draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-same-site.md (2)
    M draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding.md (2)
    M draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure.md (2)
    M draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption.md (12)
    M draft-ietf-httpbis-key.md (2)
    M draft-ietf-httpbis-origin-frame.md (2)
    M draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis.md (2)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/280.patch
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/280.diff

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/280