Subject: Re: [Enum] Neustar and GSM create alternate ROOT

From: "Stastny Richard" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 21:42:17 +0200

Yes and no,
 
Routing in IMS is done via SIP URIs (see ETSI TS 123.228)
It is a complete new root also for SIP routing of "public" User Identities (finding
the other servers)
 
Of course it will also contain a ENUM tree for mapping E.164 to these SIP URIs,
which will then also resolved within this alternate root 
 
Richard

________________________________

Von: Tom-PT Taylor [mailto:[email-masked]]
Gesendet: Fr 30.09.2005 21:37
An: Stastny Richard
Cc: [email-masked]
Betreff: Re: [Enum] Neustar and GSM create alternate ROOT

Do I understand correctly that this is a form of carrier ENUM?

Stastny Richard wrote:
> Dear co-chairs, especially Patrik,
> 
> what is your opiniion on this press release?
> 
> http://www.neustar.com/pressroom/files/announcements/ns_pr_09282005.pdf
> 
> GSM Association and NeuStar Sign Agreement to Offer Root DNS Services to More than 680 Global GSM Mobile Operators
>
> providing .grps and 3gppnetwork.org as TLD in the GRX network using public IP addresses.
> 
> I thought the IAB recommended to 3GPP NOT to do this because of leakage
> 
> Richard
>
> _______________________________________________
> enum mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
>
>

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum