Subject: [Enum] Questions about EPP Poll and error definitions for draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01

From: Bernie Hoeneisen <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:38:13 -0400

Hi!
After draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01 has been accepted as an
ENUM WG item in Minneapolis, I'd like to ask the Working Group for 
feedback concerning the following questions:

1) Do we need a standardized EPP poll message (or a similar mechanism) for
   informing the ENUM Registrar about a Validation which is going to
   expire?
2) Do we need standardized EPP error definitions for cases such as:
   a) validation method unknown
   b) validation method not allowed (for this number)
   c) validation expire date invalid / validation period too long ?
3) Do we need to add / change anything else?
If the answer to all these questions is 'no', I guess we could start the 
RFC publication process... :-)

cheers,
 Bernie
PS: URLs to the current version of the draft
  * http://ietf.hoeneisen.ch/draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01.txt
  * http://ietf.hoeneisen.ch/draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01.html
_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum