Subject: RE: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-rfc2916bis-03.txt

From: "Stastny Richard" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:29:59 +0100

Hi all,

two comments on the new draft version and one comment:

1. there is a minor typo in Section 2.4.2 last para:

... followed by 1 or more or more Enumservices ...

delete the second "or more"

2. Section 1.3 Application of local policy

last sentence: "This overrides the MUST requirement in the 
DDDS algorithm."

There is no MUST requirement in the DDDS algorithm for
the preference field (only for the order field).

I suggest therefore to delete this sentence or reword it.

Comment:

I hope this is the last change in the document

regards
Richard Stastny

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrik Fältström [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:14 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-rfc2916bis-03.txt
> 
> 
> Please make the following draft available.
> 
>      paf
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum