Subject: RE: [Enum] Proposed new ABNF

From: "Rosen, Brian" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 01:46:11 -0400

Could we be a little more elegant?
   service_field = "E2U" 1*("+" enumservice)
   enumservice   = foo *[":" foo]
   foo           = 1*32(ALPHA / DIGIT)

Convention would rename "foo" to "token"

Brian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrik Fältström [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 1:17 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [Enum] Proposed new ABNF
> 
> 
> At the IETF meeting in Yokohama, the following ABNF is proposed as a
> strawman proposal which is to be used for further discussions for
> registration documents.
> 
> Anyone with objections should on this mailing list say so.
> 
>   service_field = "E2U" 1*("+" enumservice)
>   enumservice   = foo *[bar]
>   foo           = 1*32(ALPHA / DIGIT)
>   bar           = ":" foo
> 
>    paf
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> enum mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
> 

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum