Subject: RE: [Enum] Revised ENUM Working Group Charter

From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:37:27 -0500

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Shockey [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:36 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [Enum] Revised ENUM Working Group Charter
> 
> 
> 
[snip]

> The Working Group proposes to advance RFC 2916 from Draft Standard to 
> Proposed Standard.

Shouldn't that be "from Proposed Standard to Draft Standard"?

[snip]

> Working Group Revised Goals and Scope:
> 
> 1.      The working group will update RFC 2916 to reflect the ongoing 
> revision of RFC 2915 and advance RFC 2916 to Standards Track.

2916 is already on the standards track.  I'd suggest a change from "advance
RFC 2916 to Standards Track" to either "advance RFC 2916 along the Standards
Track" or "advance RFC 2916 to Draft Standard".

-Scott-

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
[email-masked]
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum