Subject: RE: [Diffserv] Question on RSVP DiffServ

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 11:17:39 -0500

One more comment:

> Actually i am concerned about the inherent overhead that RSVP would
> introduce in the core with this approach. But since RSVP has already been
> accepted for MPLS in core, i hope its OK.

Just to be clear, MPLS uses RSVP for traffic engineering purposes.
RSVP for every microflow won't scale in the core, so use of RSVP
for QoS negotiation has to be at some traffic aggregate level, which
is what I believe Abdul intended.

Thanks,
--David
---------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Senior Technologist
EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 249-6449 *NEW*      FAX: +1 (508) 497-8500
[email-masked]         Cell: +1 (978) 394-7754
---------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
diffserv mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/current/maillist.html