Subject: [Diffserv] diffserv-pib-05 comments [sic]

From: "Da Silva, Pedro" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:22:25 -0000

The capability tables (e.g. qosIfMeteringCapsTable) have a UNIQUENESS clause
that includes the capability spec itself (as well as the direction from the
base class). This means that a user may specify more than one capability set
in one given direction, which in turn entails more work for the entity
managing and checking capabilities specs per se and capabilities specs
against policies.
Shouldn't the UNIQUENESS clause be restricted to the direction?

Pedro

_______________________________________________
diffserv mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
Archive: http://www2.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/current/maillist.html