Subject: Re: [Diffserv] on E_a and E_p- RFC2598bis

From: Brian E Carpenter <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 12:17:25 -0500

(d_j - f_j) != (D_j - F_j)

That fooled me the first time I read it, too. There is no redundancy.
(Also, the document has passed Last Call.)

   Brian

demir wrote:
> 
> RFC2598bis
>     - E_a is the error term for the treatment of the EF aggregate.
>       Note that E_a represents the worst case deviation between actual
>       departure time of an EF packet and ideal departure time of the
>       same packet, i.e. E_a provides an upper bound on (d_j - f_j) for
> 
>       - E_p is the error term for the treatment of individual EF
>       packets. Note that E_p represents the worst case deviation between
>       actual departure time of an EF packet and ideal departure time of
>       the same packet, i.e. E_p provides an upper bound on (D_j - F_j)
> 
> In the above text, both "Note that" for E_a and E_p notes the same thing.
> 
> Alper K. Demir

_______________________________________________
diffserv mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
Archive: http://www2.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/current/maillist.html