Subject: RE: [Diffserv] QoSSIG BOF

From: Michael Welzl <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 14:44:54 +0100

I don't understand that.
What's so bad about Juha's opinion that we should avoid making a
complex protocol like RSVP even more complex?

> 	Juha,
> 
> 	Great. Let us develop a new protocol that enables any webpage
> anywhere in the internet being downloadeded within a fraction
> 	of a second. I would enjoy to do so.
> 
> 	Heinrich Hummel
> 	Siemens Munich
> 	[email-masked]
> 	  
> > Yoram Bernet writes:
> > 
> >  > What I opposed was scrapping RSVP. My suggestion was 
> that the forum
> >  > should take RSVP as its opening position and then work out how to
> > modify it
> >  > to suit the requirements.
> > 
> > it doesn't make sense to add even more options to an already complex
> > protocol.  whatever is produced, must be very simple to 
> read, understand,
> > implement and use.
> > 
> > -- juha

_______________________________________________
diffserv mailing list
[email-masked]
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
Archive: http://www-nrg.ee.lbl.gov/diff-serv-arch/