Subject: [codec] #14: VAD and CNG?

From: "codec issue tracker" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 15:05:47 -0000

#14: VAD and CNG?
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
 Reporter:  hoene@…                 |       Owner:     
     Type:  defect                  |      Status:  new
 Priority:  major                   |   Milestone:     
Component:  requirements            |     Version:     
 Severity:  -                       |    Keywords:     
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
 Should VAD and separate noise encoding be a mandatory part of this codec?
 As a conferencing server vendor I would be very interested in client doing
 VAD, allowing the conferencing server only to decode and mix (or just pass
 through without transcoding) speech audio.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/codec/trac/ticket/14>
codec <http://tools.ietf.org/codec/>