Subject: Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-daboo-webdav-sync-06
From: Salvatore Loreto <[email-masked]>
To: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 20:17:13 +0200
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>

Hi SM,

sorry for being late in answering I have been on the road all the last week.

Yes I can do it, no problem

cheers
Salvatore

-- 
Salvatore Loreto
www.sloreto.com

On 12/2/11 1:52 AM, SM wrote:
> Hi Sal,
>
> Could you review draft-daboo-webdav-sync-06 before December
> 20?  Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT
> post it to apps-review.
>
> The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the
> WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the
> tools [email-masked] to cover the
> authors, WG chairs, and shepherd.  If your review recommends
> significant changes to a working-group document, you should also
> consider copying the working group's mailing list.
>
> Suggested distribution:
>      To: [email-masked],  [email-masked]
>      cc: [email-masked]
>
> You can view the Apps-review template at
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  Some previous
> reviews are accessible at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker
>
> Best regards,
> -sm
>
>

Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:08:45 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <[email-masked]>
To: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-01

On 2011-12-05 21:48, SM wrote:
> Hi Julian,
> At 12:25 05-12-2011, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> I just had a look, and the draft indeed is a very small update over
>> RFC 6046.
>
> RFC 6046 is Informational.

Oh, indeed. First time I see an update like that.

>> It this was new, I would have a few comments on how it uses HTTP, but
>> given the fact it already has been accepted as Proposed, this seems
>> pointless.
>>
>> Do we need a more formal review than that?
>
> The intended status of draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-01 is Proposed
> Standard. A formal review is helpful as it is provides the point of view
> of somebody with HTTP expertise. It's also less work for the Apps ADs. :-)

OK, will do.

Best regards, Julian

Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:48:28 -0800
To: Julian Reschke <[email-masked]>
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-01

Hi Julian,
At 12:25 05-12-2011, Julian Reschke wrote:
>I just had a look, and the draft indeed is a very small update over RFC 6046.

RFC 6046 is Informational.

>It this was new, I would have a few comments on how it uses HTTP, 
>but given the fact it already has been accepted as Proposed, this 
>seems pointless.
>
>Do we need a more formal review than that?

The intended status of draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-01 is Proposed 
Standard.  A formal review is helpful as it is provides the point of 
view of somebody with HTTP expertise.  It's also less work for the 
Apps ADs. :-)

Best regards,
-sm 

Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 21:25:53 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <[email-masked]>
To: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-01

On 2011-12-03 21:49, SM wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> Could you review draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-01 before December 20?

I just had a look, and the draft indeed is a very small update over RFC 
6046.

It this was new, I would have a few comments on how it uses HTTP, but 
given the fact it already has been accepted as Proposed, this seems 
pointless.

Do we need a more formal review than that?

 > ...

Best regards, Julian

From: Joseph Yee <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 12:05:07 -0500
To: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-jiang-a6-to-historic-00

Hi,

I will review the draft.

Joseph

On 2011-12-05, at 9:49 AM, SM wrote:

> Hi Joseph,
>=20
> Could you review draft-jiang-a6-to-historic-00 before December 20?  =
Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT post it =
to apps-review.
>=20
> The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the =
WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the tools =
alias [email-masked] to cover the =
authors, WG chairs, and shepherd.  If your review recommends significant =
changes to a working-group document, you should also consider copying =
the working group's mailing list.
>=20
> Suggested distribution:
>   To: [email-masked],  =
[email-masked]
>   cc: [email-masked]
>=20
> You can view the Apps-review template at =
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  Some previous =
reviews are accessible at =
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker
>=20
> Best regards,
> -sm
>=20

Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 06:49:50 -0800
To: Joseph Yee <[email-masked]>
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-jiang-a6-to-historic-00

Hi Joseph,

Could you review draft-jiang-a6-to-historic-00 before December 
20?  Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT 
post it to apps-review.

The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the 
WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the 
tools alias [email-masked] to cover 
the authors, WG chairs, and shepherd.  If your review recommends 
significant changes to a working-group document, you should also 
consider copying the working group's mailing list.

Suggested distribution:
    To: [email-masked],  [email-masked]
    cc: [email-masked]

You can view the Apps-review template at 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  Some previous 
reviews are accessible at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker

Best regards,
-sm

Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 12:49:39 -0800
To: Julian Reschke <[email-masked]>
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-01

Hi Julian,

Could you review  draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-01 before December 
20?  Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT 
post it to apps-review.

The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the authors, the WG Chairs 
and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the tools alias 
[email-masked] to cover the authors, 
WG chairs, and shepherd.  If your review recommends significant 
changes to a working-group document, you should also consider copying 
the working group's mailing list.

Suggested distribution:
    To: [email-masked], [email-masked]

I removed the IESG from the distribution as this is an early review.

You can view the Apps-review template at 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  Some previous 
reviews are accessible at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker

Best regards,
-sm

Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 08:28:57 -0800
To: Larry Masinter <[email-masked]>
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-ietf-mile-rfc6045-bis-01

Hi Larry,

Could you review draft-ietf-mile-rfc6045-bis-01 before December 
20?  Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT 
post it to apps-review.

The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the authors, the WG Chairs 
and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the tools alias 
[email-masked] to cover the authors, 
WG chairs, and shepherd.  If your review recommends significant 
changes to a working-group document, you should also consider copying 
the working group's mailing list.

Suggested distribution:
    To: [email-masked],  [email-masked]

I removed the IESG from the distribution as this is an early review.

You can view the Apps-review template at 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  Some previous 
reviews are accessible at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker

Best regards,
-sm

Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 07:57:31 -0800
To: [email-masked]
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Subject: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-05

Hello,

As I am going to review draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-05 anyway, 
I'll do it as an Apps review.

Best regards,
-sm

Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 23:06:01 +0900
From: Yoshiro YONEYA <[email-masked]>
To: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-04

Dear SM,

Ack, I'll do my best.
Sorry for my delayed response.

Regards,

-- 
Yoshiro YONEYA <[email-masked]>

On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:19:17 -0800 SM <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Hi Yoshiro,
> 
> Could you review draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-04 before 
> December 20?  Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), 
> and DO NOT post it to apps-review.
> 
> The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the 
> WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the 
> tools alias [email-masked] to 
> cover the authors, WG chairs, and shepherd.  If your review 
> recommends significant changes to a working-group document, you 
> should also consider copying the working group's mailing list.
> 
> Suggested distribution:
>     To: 
> [email-masked],  [email-masked]
>     cc: [email-masked]
> 
> You can view the Apps-review template at 
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  Some previous 
> reviews are accessible at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker
> 
> Best regards,
> -sm
> 
> 

From: "Jiankang YAO" <[email-masked]>
To: "SM" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 09:12:26 +0800
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-gregorio-uritemplate-07

Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 17:26:56 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <[email-masked]>
To: SM <[email-masked]>
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-04

Another AD-sponsored I-D. Writeup here:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation/writeup/

On 12/1/11 5:19 PM, SM wrote:
> Hi Yoshiro,
> 
> Could you review draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-04 before December
> 20?  Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT
> post it to apps-review.
> 
> The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the WG
> Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the tools
> alias [email-masked] to cover the
> authors, WG chairs, and shepherd.  If your review recommends significant
> changes to a working-group document, you should also consider copying
> the working group's mailing list.
> 
> Suggested distribution:
>    To: [email-masked], 
> [email-masked]
>    cc: [email-masked]
> 
> You can view the Apps-review template at
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  Some previous
> reviews are accessible at
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker
> 
> Best regards,
> -sm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> apps-review mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review

Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 17:26:20 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <[email-masked]>
To: SM <[email-masked]>
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-daboo-webdav-sync-06

FWIW, I am AD-sponsoring this spec. My writeup is here:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-daboo-webdav-sync/writeup/

On 12/1/11 4:52 PM, SM wrote:
> Hi Sal,
> 
> Could you review draft-daboo-webdav-sync-06 before December 20?  Please
> post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT post it to
> apps-review.
> 
> The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the WG
> Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the tools
> [email-masked] to cover the authors, WG
> chairs, and shepherd.  If your review recommends significant changes to
> a working-group document, you should also consider copying the working
> group's mailing list.
> 
> Suggested distribution:
>    To: [email-masked],  [email-masked]
>    cc: [email-masked]
> 
> You can view the Apps-review template at
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  Some previous
> reviews are accessible at
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker
> 
> Best regards,
> -sm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> apps-review mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review

Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:19:17 -0800
To: Yoshiro YONEYA <[email-masked]>
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-04

Hi Yoshiro,

Could you review draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-04 before 
December 20?  Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), 
and DO NOT post it to apps-review.

The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the 
WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the 
tools alias [email-masked] to 
cover the authors, WG chairs, and shepherd.  If your review 
recommends significant changes to a working-group document, you 
should also consider copying the working group's mailing list.

Suggested distribution:
    To: 
[email-masked],  [email-masked]
    cc: [email-masked]

You can view the Apps-review template at 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  Some previous 
reviews are accessible at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker

Best regards,
-sm

Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 15:52:22 -0800
To: Salvatore Loreto <[email-masked]>
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-daboo-webdav-sync-06

Hi Sal,

Could you review draft-daboo-webdav-sync-06 before December 
20?  Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT 
post it to apps-review.

The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the 
WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the 
tools [email-masked] to cover the 
authors, WG chairs, and shepherd.  If your review recommends 
significant changes to a working-group document, you should also 
consider copying the working group's mailing list.

Suggested distribution:
    To: [email-masked],  [email-masked]
    cc: [email-masked]

You can view the Apps-review template at 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  Some previous 
reviews are accessible at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker

Best regards,
-sm

Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 15:35:29 -0800
To: Dave Cridland <[email-masked]>
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [apps-review] [apps-discuss] Request for review: draft-arkko-ipv6-only-experience-04

Hi Dave,
At 15:07 01-12-2011, Dave Cridland wrote:
>This is a great document. I will certainly read it again, and I may
>update my review as a result.

You did the first and fastest Applications Directorate review. :-)

If you update the review, please include the information at 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  I added your 
review to the tracker ( 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker ).

Thanks for review,
-sm 

Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 22:38:01 +0100 (CET)
From: Claudio Allocchio <[email-masked]>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11

On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> On 12/1/11 1:05 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of SM
>>> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 7:41 AM
>>> To: Claudio Allocchio
>>> Cc: [email-masked]
>>> Subject: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11
>>>
>>> Hi Claudio,
>>>
>>> Could you review draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11 before December 15?
>>> Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT post it
>>> to apps-review.
>>
>> I'll do it if he doesn't want it!
>
> Great idea, thanks for volunteering! ;-)

you want an additional t-shirt for self reviewing ? :-)

It reminds me when the "fine manual" was stating "if this trobleshooting 
procedure does not fix the problem, please consult your system 
administrator"... and I was going to ask in front of a mirror!

;-)
  >
>
> _______________________________________________
> apps-review mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Claudio Allocchio             G   A   R   R          [email-masked]
                         Senior Technical Officer
tel: +39 040 3758523      Italian Academic and       G=Claudio; S=Allocchio;
fax: +39 040 3758565        Research Network         P=garr; A=garr; C=it;

            PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca

Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 22:33:15 +0100 (CET)
From: Claudio Allocchio <[email-masked]>
To: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11

On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, SM wrote:

> Hi Claudio,
>
> Could you review draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11 before December 15?  Please 
> post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT post it to 
> apps-review.

ok, ACK!

>
> The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the WG 
> Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the tools alias 
> [email-masked] to cover the authors, WG chairs, 
> and shepherd.  If your review recommends significant changes to a 
> working-group document, you should also consider copying the working group's 
> mailing list.
>
> Suggested distribution:
>   To: [email-masked],  [email-masked]
>   cc: [email-masked]
>
> You can view the Apps-review template at 
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  Some previous reviews 
> are accessible at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker
>
> Best regards,
> -sm
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Claudio Allocchio             G   A   R   R          [email-masked]
                         Senior Technical Officer
tel: +39 040 3758523      Italian Academic and       G=Claudio; S=Allocchio;
fax: +39 040 3758565        Research Network         P=garr; A=garr; C=it;

            PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca

Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 12:39:23 -0800
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email-masked]>
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11

Hi Murray,
At 12:05 01-12-2011, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>I'll do it if he doesn't want it!

If you want to take up the review, I'll ask you to write one which 
argues that the draft is not ready for publication as 
Experimental.  Send it to me off-list and I'll post it to this list 
after the apps review has been completed if the ADs agree not to take 
your review into consideration for the evaluation.

Best regards,
-sm 

Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:09:58 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <[email-masked]>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email-masked]>
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11

On 12/1/11 1:05 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of SM
>> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 7:41 AM
>> To: Claudio Allocchio
>> Cc: [email-masked]
>> Subject: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11
>>
>> Hi Claudio,
>>
>> Could you review draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11 before December 15?
>> Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT post it
>> to apps-review.
> 
> I'll do it if he doesn't want it!

Great idea, thanks for volunteering! ;-)

From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email-masked]>
To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 12:05:01 -0800
Accept-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] =
On Behalf Of SM
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 7:41 AM
> To: Claudio Allocchio
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11
>=20
> Hi Claudio,
>=20
> Could you review draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11 before December 15?
> Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT post it
> to apps-review.

I'll do it if he doesn't want it!

Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 12:55:05 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <[email-masked]>
To: SM <[email-masked]>
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-gregorio-uritemplate-07

Just FYI, I have placed this document on the January 5 telechat.

On 12/1/11 8:31 AM, SM wrote:
> Hi Jiankang,
> 
> Could you review draft-gregorio-uritemplate-07 before December 15? 
> Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT post it
> to apps-review.
> 
> The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the WG
> Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the tools
> alias  [email-masked] to cover the
> authors, WG chairs, and shepherd.  If your review recommends significant
> changes to a working-group document, you should also consider copying
> the working group's mailing list.
> 
> Suggested distribution:
>    To: [email-masked], 
> [email-masked]
>    cc: [email-masked]
> 
> You can view the Apps-review template at
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  Some previous
> reviews are accessible at
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker
> 
> Best regards,
> -sm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> apps-review mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review

Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 07:31:28 -0800
To: Jiankang YAO <[email-masked]>
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-gregorio-uritemplate-07

Hi Jiankang,

Could you review draft-gregorio-uritemplate-07 before December 
15?  Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT 
post it to apps-review.

The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the 
WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the 
tools alias  [email-masked] to cover 
the authors, WG chairs, and shepherd.  If your review recommends 
significant changes to a working-group document, you should also 
consider copying the working group's mailing list.

Suggested distribution:
    To: [email-masked],  [email-masked]
    cc: [email-masked]

You can view the Apps-review template at 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  Some previous 
reviews are accessible at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker

Best regards,
-sm

Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 07:40:38 -0800
To: Claudio Allocchio <[email-masked]>
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11

Hi Claudio,

Could you review draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11 before December 
15?  Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT 
post it to apps-review.

The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the 
WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the 
tools alias [email-masked] to cover the 
authors, WG chairs, and shepherd.  If your review recommends 
significant changes to a working-group document, you should also 
consider copying the working group's mailing list.

Suggested distribution:
    To: [email-masked],  [email-masked]
    cc: [email-masked]

You can view the Apps-review template at 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  Some previous 
reviews are accessible at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker

Best regards,
-sm

Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 07:13:18 -0800
To: Tobias Gondrom <[email-masked]>
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-ietf-geopriv-policy-uri-04

Hi Tobias,

Could you review draft-ietf-geopriv-policy-uri-04 before December 
12?  Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT 
post it to apps-review.

The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the 
WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the 
tools alias   [email-masked] to 
cover the authors, WG chairs, and shepherd.  If your review 
recommends significant changes to a working-group document, you 
should also consider copying the working group's mailing list.

Suggested distribution:
    To: 
[email-masked],   [email-masked]
    cc: [email-masked]

You can view the Apps-review template at 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  Some previous 
reviews are accessible at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker

Best regards,
-sm

Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 07:21:34 -0800
To: Dave Cridland <[email-masked]>
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-arkko-ipv6-only-experience-04

Hi Dave,

Could you review draft-arkko-ipv6-only-experience-04 before December 
15?  Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT 
post it to apps-review.

The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the 
WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the 
tools alias  [email-masked] to 
cover the authors, WG chairs, and shepherd.  If your review 
recommends significant changes to a working-group document, you 
should also consider copying the working group's mailing list.

Suggested distribution:
    To: 
[email-masked],  [email-masked]
    cc: [email-masked]

You can view the Apps-review template at 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  Some previous 
reviews are accessible at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker

Best regards,
-sm

From [email-masked]  Thu Dec  8 14:42:50 2011
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:38:52 -0800
To: [email-masked]
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Subject: [appsdir] Apps-review migrated to appsdir

Hello

The apps-review mailing list has been migrated to the appsdir mailing 
list.  The subscribers have automatically been subscribed to the new 
list.  The list information is at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir

Please do not send any messages to apps-review as the email address 
is no longer valid.

Best regards,
-sm

From [email-masked]  Thu Dec  8 14:45:54 2011
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:45:51 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <[email-masked]>
To: SM <[email-masked]>
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [appsdir] Apps-review migrated to appsdir

On 12/8/11 3:38 PM, SM wrote:

> The apps-review mailing list has been migrated to the appsdir mailing
> list.

Yay, we're all directors now! :)

From [email-masked]  Thu Dec  8 15:24:40 2011
From: IETF Secretariat <[email-masked]>
To: IETF Announcement list <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu,  8 Dec 2011 15:24:40 -0800 (PST)
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Subject: [appsdir] New Non-WG Mailing List: appsdir -- Apps Area Directorate List

A new IETF non-working group email list has been created.

Apps Area Directorate List
List address: [email-masked]
Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/appsdir/
To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir

Purpose: This is the discussion list for the Applications Area 
Directorate and replaces the [email-masked] list.

For additional information, please contact the list administrators.

From [email-masked]  Fri Dec  9 01:01:53 2011
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:01:38 +0100 (CET)
From: Claudio Allocchio <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [appsdir] New Non-WG Mailing List: appsdir -- Apps Area Directorate List

> Apps Area Directorate List
> List address: [email-masked]
> Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/appsdir/
> To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir

... is the list open to free subscription? I do not remember if this was 
the policy of our previous list, too. But I was thinking if the list 
should be open or not.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Claudio Allocchio             G   A   R   R          [email-masked]
                         Senior Technical Officer
tel: +39 040 3758523      Italian Academic and       G=Claudio; S=Allocchio;
fax: +39 040 3758565        Research Network         P=garr; A=garr; C=it;

            PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca

From [email-masked]  Fri Dec  9 03:26:52 2011
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 03:24:29 -0800
To: Claudio Allocchio <[email-masked]>
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [appsdir] New Non-WG Mailing List: appsdir -- Apps Area Directorate List

Hi Claudio,
At 01:01 09-12-2011, Claudio Allocchio wrote:
>... is the list open to free subscription? I do not remember if this 
>was the policy of our previous list, too. But I was thinking if the 
>list should be open or not.

The subscriber list comprises members of the team only.  It is 
similar to previous list.  The mailing list archive is publicly accessible.

Best regards,
-sm 

From [email-masked]  Fri Dec  9 08:02:03 2011
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 08:38:01 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <[email-masked]>
To: SM <[email-masked]>
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Cc: [email-masked], Claudio Allocchio <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [appsdir] New Non-WG Mailing List: appsdir -- Apps Area Directorate List

On 12/9/11 4:24 AM, SM wrote:
> Hi Claudio,
> At 01:01 09-12-2011, Claudio Allocchio wrote:
>> ... is the list open to free subscription? I do not remember if this
>> was the policy of our previous list, too. But I was thinking if the
>> list should be open or not.
> 
> The subscriber list comprises members of the team only.  It is similar
> to previous list.  The mailing list archive is publicly accessible.

Right. And we have apps-discuss for open discussion. The appsdir list is
for team coordination.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

From [email-masked]  Fri Dec  9 09:06:22 2011
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 08:56:24 -0800
To: Eliot Lear <[email-masked]>
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements-05

Hi Eliot,

Could you review draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements-05 before 
December 30?  Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), 
and DO NOT post it to apps-review.

The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the 
WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the 
tools alias [email-masked] to 
cover the authors, WG chairs, and shepherd.  If your review 
recommends significant changes to a working-group document, you 
should also consider copying the working group's mailing list.

Suggested distribution:
    To: [email-masked], 
[email-masked]
    cc: [email-masked]

You can view the Apps-review template at 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  Some previous 
reviews are accessible at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker

Best regards,
-sm

From [email-masked]  Fri Dec  9 09:17:05 2011
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 09:13:12 -0800
To: Glenn Parsons <[email-masked]>
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-04

Hi Eliot,

Could you review draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-04 before December 
30?  Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT 
post it to appsdir.

The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the 
WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the 
tools alias [email-masked] to cover 
the authors, WG chairs, and shepherd.  If your review recommends 
significant changes to a working-group document, you should also 
consider copying the working group's mailing list.

Suggested distribution:
    To: [email-masked], [email-masked]
    Cc: [email-masked]

You can view the Apps-review template at 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  Some previous 
reviews are accessible at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker

Best regards,
-sm

From [email-masked]  Fri Dec  9 09:18:35 2011
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:18:27 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <[email-masked]>
To: SM <[email-masked]>
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Cc: [email-masked], Glenn Parsons <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-04

On 12/9/11 10:13 AM, SM wrote:
> Hi Eliot,

Copy and paste error. I think you meant Glenn. :)

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

From [email-masked]  Fri Dec  9 09:35:48 2011
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 09:34:32 -0800
To: Peter Saint-Andre <[email-masked]>
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked], Glenn Parsons <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [appsdir] Request for review:  draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-04

At 09:18 09-12-2011, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>Copy and paste error. I think you meant Glenn. :)

Yes, sorry about that, I meant Glenn.

Best regards,
-sm 

From [email-masked]  Fri Dec  9 09:55:34 2011
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:55:22 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <[email-masked]>
To: SM <[email-masked]>
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Cc: [email-masked], Glenn Parsons <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-04

On 12/9/11 10:34 AM, SM wrote:
> At 09:18 09-12-2011, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Copy and paste error. I think you meant Glenn. :)
> 
> Yes, sorry about that, I meant Glenn.

Mostly I wanted to make sure that you weren't assigning two reviews to
Eliot on the same day. We take proper care of our volunteers, after all!

From [email-masked]  Sat Dec 10 01:10:46 2011
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 10:10:42 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <[email-masked]>
To: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [appsdir] Request for review: draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements-05

Yes I can!

On 12/9/11 5:56 PM, SM wrote:
> Hi Eliot,
>
> Could you review draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements-05 before December
> 30?  Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT
> post it to apps-review.
>
> The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the
> WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the tools
> alias [email-masked] to cover
> the authors, WG chairs, and shepherd.  If your review recommends
> significant changes to a working-group document, you should also
> consider copying the working group's mailing list.
>
> Suggested distribution:
>    To: [email-masked],
> [email-masked]
>    cc: [email-masked]
>
> You can view the Apps-review template at
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  Some previous
> reviews are accessible at
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker
>
> Best regards,
> -sm
>
>

From [email-masked]  Mon Dec 12 14:53:54 2011
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:53:28 -0800
To: Ted Hardie <[email-masked]>
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [appsdir] Request for review:

Hi Ted,

Pete requested a review of 
draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-protocol-04.  Could you review the draft 
before December 14 (afternoon PDT) as it is up for IESG Evaluation 
this week?  I apologize for the short deadline.

Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT post 
it to appsdir.

The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the 
WG Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the 
tools alias [email-masked] to 
cover the authors, WG chairs, and shepherd.  If your review 
recommends significant changes to a working-group document, you 
should also consider copying the working group's mailing list.

Suggested distribution:
    To: [email-masked], 
[email-masked]
    Cc: [email-masked]

You can view the Apps-review template at 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template  Some previous 
reviews are accessible at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker

Best regards,
-sm

From [email-masked]  Mon Dec 12 14:57:43 2011
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:57:41 -0800
From: Ted Hardie <[email-masked]>
To: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [appsdir] Request for review:

--20cf303bfe28dac40904b3ed0f90
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I'll do my best.

regards,

Ted

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:53 PM, SM <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Hi Ted,
>
> Pete requested a review of draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-**protocol-04.  Could
> you review the draft before December 14 (afternoon PDT) as it is up for
> IESG Evaluation this week?  I apologize for the short deadline.
>
> Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT post it to
> appsdir.
>
> The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the WG
> Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  You can use the tools alias
> [email-masked]<[email-masked]>to cover the authors, WG chairs, and shepherd.  If your review recommends
> significant changes to a working-group document, you should also consider
> copying the working group's mailing list.
>
> Suggested distribution:
>   To: [email-masked], draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-**
> [email-masked]<[email-masked]>
>   Cc: [email-masked]
>
> You can view the Apps-review template at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/**
> area/app/trac/wiki/template<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/template> Some previous reviews are accessible at
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/**area/app/trac/wiki/tracker<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker>
>
> Best regards,
> -sm
>
>

--20cf303bfe28dac40904b3ed0f90
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I&#39;ll do my best.<br><br>regards,<br><br>Ted<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_=
quote">On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:53 PM, SM <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D=
"mailto:[email-masked]">[email-masked]</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<=
br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Ted,<br>
<br>
Pete requested a review of draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-<u></u>protocol-04. =A0=
Could you review the draft before December 14 (afternoon PDT) as it is up f=
or IESG Evaluation this week? =A0I apologize for the short deadline.<br>
<br>
Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT post it to =
appsdir.<br>
<br>
The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the IESG, the authors, the WG Ch=
airs and document shepherd, if applicable. =A0You can use the tools alias <=
a href=3D"mailto:[email-masked]" targ=
et=3D"_blank">draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-<u></u>[email-masked]</=
a> to cover the authors, WG chairs, and shepherd. =A0If your review recomme=
nds significant changes to a working-group document, you should also consid=
er copying the working group&#39;s mailing list.<br>

<br>
Suggested distribution:<br>
 =A0 To: <a href=3D"mailto:[email-masked]" target=3D"_blank">apps-di=
[email-masked]</a>, <a href=3D"mailto:draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-protocol.all=
@tools.ietf.org" target=3D"_blank">draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-<u></u>protocol=
[email-masked]</a><br>

 =A0 Cc: <a href=3D"mailto:[email-masked]" target=3D"_blank">[email-masked]</=
a><br>
<br>
You can view the Apps-review template at <a href=3D"http://trac.tools.ietf.=
org/area/app/trac/wiki/template" target=3D"_blank">http://trac.tools.ietf.o=
rg/<u></u>area/app/trac/wiki/template</a> =A0Some previous reviews are acce=
ssible at <a href=3D"http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/tracker"=
 target=3D"_blank">http://trac.tools.ietf.org/<u></u>area/app/trac/wiki/tra=
cker</a><br>

<br>
Best regards,<br><font color=3D"#888888">
-sm<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>

--20cf303bfe28dac40904b3ed0f90--

From [email-masked]  Thu Dec 15 14:23:03 2011
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:20:00 -0800
To: [email-masked]
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Subject: [appsdir] Appsdir holidays

Hello,

The Apps ADs agreed to a break for the holidays.  I don't plan to 
send out any assignment from December 15 to January 5, 2012 unless 
there is a special request from the ADs.

Best regards,
-sm

From [email-masked]  Thu Dec 15 14:24:45 2011
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:24:43 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <[email-masked]>
To: SM <[email-masked]>
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [appsdir] Appsdir holidays

On 12/15/11 3:20 PM, SM wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> The Apps ADs agreed to a break for the holidays.  I don't plan to send
> out any assignment from December 15 to January 5, 2012 unless there is a
> special request from the ADs.

I don't plan on any special requests. :)

Happy holidays and here's to a successful new year!

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

From [email-masked]  Fri Dec 16 15:47:35 2011
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:46:26 -0800
To: [email-masked]
From: S Moonesamy <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [appsdir] [OAUTH-WG] OK to post OAuth Bearer draft 15?

At 18:13 14-12-2011, Mike Jones wrote:
>Any objections to posting the updated Bearer draft incorporating the 
>results of the APPS Area review and the TLS requirements?

Mark Nottingham followed up on his review [1].  If this working group 
considers that the concerns raised have been addressed, I gather that 
it ok for me to raise them as issues during the Last Call for 
draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08052.html
2. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg03805.html 

From [email-masked]  Wed Dec 21 10:23:14 2011
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:20:28 -0800
To: Barry Leiba <[email-masked]>
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: Hannes Tschofenig <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [appsdir] [OAUTH-WG] OK to post OAuth Bearer draft 15?

Hi Barry,
At 10:51 18-12-2011, Barry Leiba wrote:
>As Mark points out, he does not have the standing to block the
>publication of anything; he has just brought up issues that he sees
>with the document as it stands.  But the chairs, the responsible AD,
>and, ultimately, the rest of the IESG can block publication if
>substantive issues have not been addressed, and we think that the
>unresolved problems could be bad for the Internet.  The working group
>needs to make sure that it's clear how those substantive issues have
>been addressed, or why they don't matter.

Thanks for explaining the finer details.  I left them out to keep 
this message short ( 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08069.html ).

Best regards,
-sm