Subject: [APPS-REVIEW] draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-map-05
From: SM <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 23:07:07 -0700
List-Id: Applications Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>

Hello,

Alexey asked for a review of draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-map-05 [1].  One 
of the comments is that the whole NETCONF-data space is badly 
broken.  As some of you have expertise in schema languages, could you 
take a look at YANG and NETCONF and comment on that?

This is the kind of question where it is handy to tap on the IETF 
experience of the team members.  What does the team think about going 
down that road?  Do you have an advice on how to frame the review?

For some background information on NETCONF, see RFC 3535 and 
draft-presuhn-rcdml-03 [2].

Regards,
-sm

1. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-map/
2. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-presuhn-rcdml-03

Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 11:39:56 -0700
To: [email-masked]
From: S Moonesamy <[email-masked]>
Subject: [APPS-REVIEW] Applications Area Review Team

Hello,

There is an Applications Area Review Team that=20
assists the two Application Area Directors by=20
providing semi-formal reviews of Internet-Drafts=20
as a way to improve the quality of IETF=20
specifications.  The team receives requests for=20
reviews from the Application Area Directors.

The author of an Internet-Draft may also request=20
a review by contacting the Applications Area=20
Review Team Lead.  It is advisable to have a=20
discussion of the proposal on an IETF mailing=20
list before making such a request.

The members of the team are selected from the=20
IETF community and have expertise in areas such=20
as Messaging, Publishing, Internationalization,=20
Calendaring, Security, Social Networking,=20
Collaboration, Web architecture and web services,=20
Schemas, Directories, etc.  The current members are:

  Claudio Allocchio
  Mark Baker
  Joshua Bell
  Marc Blanchet
  Eric Burger
  Dave Cridland
  Dave Crocker
  Martin D=FCrst
  Lisa Dusseault
  Vijay Gurbani
  Eran Hammer-Lahav
  Ted Hardie
  Joe Hildebrand
  John Klensin
  Murray S. Kucherawy
  Scott Lawrence
  Xiaodong Lee
  Eliot Lear
  Alexey Melnikov
  Enrico Marocco
  Mark Nottingham
  Glenn Parsons
  Julian Reschke
  Thomas Roessler
  Peter Saint-Andre
  Aaron Stone
  Henry S. Thompson
  Kurt Zeilenga

You can find more information about the=20
Applications Area Review Team at=20
http://www.apps.ietf.org/content/applications-area-review-team

Regards,
S. Moonesamy
On behalf of the Applications Area Review Team

Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 01:03:46 -0700
To: [email-masked]
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [APPS-REVIEW] Applications Area Review (new) Team update

Hi Dave,
At 23:11 25-05-10, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>Having a list of topics that the Apps ADs are especially interested 
>would be excellent.  I suggest adding whatever the current set is, 
>to each review query, so the reviewers do not have to recover this, 
>or other, postings to the list citing such items.  (I'm not 
>suggesting tailoring the list to each review request, but making it 
>a standard list, leaving it to the reviewer to decide what applies 
>to the particular review.)

Thanks, I'll follow your suggestion.

The Apps ADs issues list will be interesting to work on as it can 
help to reduce the AD workload while providing authors with a better 
view on how to reduce nits before their draft is reviewed by the team.

Henry S. Thompson from the W3C Technical Architecture Group will be 
joining the team and bring in more XML expertise.  We also have 
Murray S. Kucherawy, MARF WG Chair, as a new team member.

Best regards,
-sm 

Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 23:11:08 -0700
From: Dave CROCKER <[email-masked]>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
To: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [APPS-REVIEW] Applications Area Review (new) Team update
Reply-To: [email-masked]

On 5/19/2010 10:29 AM, SM wrote:
> Alexey mentioned that he is interested in comments about:
>
> ABNF
> Date/time
> Error handling
> Extensibility
> Internationalization
> Use of XML/XML schema
> Use of URIs, etc.
>
> This is not the complete list of issues to look out for. Alexey and
> Peter will provide a list of typical Apps Area issues so that we have a
> better idea of what to look for.

Having a list of topics that the Apps ADs are especially interested would be 
excellent.  I suggest adding whatever the current set is, to each review query, 
so the reviewers do not have to recover this, or other, postings to the list 
citing such items.  (I'm not suggesting tailoring the list to each review 
request, but making it a standard list, leaving it to the reviewer to decide 
what applies to the particular review.)

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 02:41:35 -0700
To: Thomas Roessler <[email-masked]>
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [APPS-REVIEW] Applications Area Review (new) Team update

Hi Thomas,
At 01:47 25-05-10, Thomas Roessler wrote:
>I thought I had replied...  Given current workload, I fear I'll need 
>to step back from review obligations (at least for now).

You did.  I apologize for missing your message.  It is a case of an 
incorrect filtering rule directing the message to the wrong working 
group mailbox.  I replied to your previous message.  Let's see 
whether we can find a way to keep you on board.

Best regards,
-sm 

From: Thomas Roessler <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 10:47:27 +0200
To: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [APPS-REVIEW] Applications Area Review (new) Team update

On 19 May 2010, at 19:29, SM wrote:

> I have not received any reply from the following members:
>=20
> Thomas Roessler

I thought I had replied...  Given current workload, I fear I'll need to =
step back from review obligations (at least for now).

Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 10:44:19 -0700
To: [email-masked]
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: Claudio Allocchio <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [APPS-REVIEW] Applications Area Review (new) Team update

At 05:18 24-05-10, Claudio Allocchio wrote:
>which client (not conforming to rfc2822) are you using?

That should be RFC 5321.  I asked about the MUA off-list.

At 05:43 24-05-10, Eric Burger wrote:
>According to the message headers, Dr. Lee is using Thunderbird 
>3.0.4. Possibly a MTA or firewall issue?

The MTA is Postfix and it supports sub-addressing.

At 06:25 24-05-10, Claudio Allocchio wrote:
>I've seen similar issues in the past related to "local-part" 
>rewriting/handling in conjunction with database entries "searches".
>To be more exact, an MTA was consulting an Oracle DB for each 
>local-part, and the presence of pefectly legal atext character was 
>generating a DB search error, which turned into an "unknown" MTA 
>error. The offending character in that case was "%" in an old style 
>poor-man-routing case.

The "%" is also a SQL wildcard.

At 08:46 24-05-10, John C Klensin wrote:
>         * some idiot writes an application that "knows" that no
>         special character can appear in an email local-path
>         address except possibly "." or "-" or applies the LDH
>         domain rules to the entire address, yielding the same
>         result.

There is a view that matching 99.99% of email addresses in use is good enough.

Regards,
-sm 

Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 11:46:18 -0400
From: John C Klensin <[email-masked]>
To: Claudio Allocchio <[email-masked]>, SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [APPS-REVIEW] Applications Area Review (new) Team update

--On Monday, May 24, 2010 2:18 PM +0200 Claudio Allocchio
<[email-masked]> wrote:

>...
> "messaging" hat on: it is really quite strange to come across
> such an issue, and just "now":
> 
> local-part      =       dot-atom / quoted-string /
> obs-local-part
> dot-atom        =       [CFWS] dot-atom-text [CFWS]
> dot-atom-text   =       1*atext *("." 1*atext)

I see this all the time when any sort of web interface, or
interface to a database supporting we interfaces, are concerned.
Basically, "+" is taken as an escape for " ", and either:

	* The local part string [email-masked] turns into
	"john [email-masked]", but the quotes are absent, so it it
	treated as either :john <[email-masked]>" or as a syntax
	error.
	
	* The string "john+ietf" is matched against "john ietf",
	which got into the database via a web interface, and
	that match of course fails.
	
	* The string "john ietf" is matched against "john+ietf"
	in the database and that match of course fails.
	
	* some idiot writes an application that "knows" that no
	special character can appear in an email local-path
	address except possibly "." or "-" or applies the LDH
	domain rules to the entire address, yielding the same
	result.

john

Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 15:25:11 +0200 (CEST)
From: Claudio Allocchio <[email-masked]>
To: Eric Burger <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [APPS-REVIEW] Applications Area Review (new) Team update

On Mon, 24 May 2010, Eric Burger wrote:

> According to the message headers, Dr. Lee is using Thunderbird 3.0.4. 
> Possibly a MTA or firewall issue?

Hi Eric,

I've seen similar issues in the past related to "local-part" 
rewriting/handling in conjunction with database entries "searches".
To be more exact, an MTA was consulting an Oracle DB for each local-part, 
and the presence of pefectly legal atext character was generating a DB 
search error, which turned into an "unknown" MTA error. The offending 
character in that case was "%" in an old style poor-man-routing case.

We need more info on the enviroment from Dr. Lee, I'm afraid.

>>
>> local-part      =       dot-atom / quoted-string / obs-local-part
>> dot-atom        =       [CFWS] dot-atom-text [CFWS]
>> dot-atom-text   =       1*atext *("." 1*atext)
>>
>> and
>>
>> atext           =       ALPHA / DIGIT / ; Any character except controls,
>>                        "!" / "#" /     ;  SP, and specials.
>>                        "$" / "%" /     ;  Used for atoms
>>                        "&" / "'" /
>>                        "*" / "+" /
>>                        "-" / "/" /
>>                        "=" / "?" /
>>                        "^" / "_" /
>>                        "`" / "{" /
>>                        "|" / "}" /
>>                        "~"
>>
>> which client (not conforming to rfc2822) are you using?
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Claudio Allocchio             G   A   R   R          [email-masked]
>>                        Senior Technical Officer
>> tel: +39 040 3758523      Italian Academic and       G=Claudio; S=Allocchio;
>> fax: +39 040 3758565        Research Network         P=garr; A=garr; C=it;
>>
>>           PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca
>> _______________________________________________
>> APPS-REVIEW mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Claudio Allocchio             G   A   R   R          [email-masked]
                          Senior Technical Officer
tel: +39 040 3758523      Italian Academic and       G=Claudio; S=Allocchio;
fax: +39 040 3758565        Research Network         P=garr; A=garr; C=it;

             PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca

From: Eric Burger <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 08:43:38 -0400
To: Claudio Allocchio <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [APPS-REVIEW] Applications Area Review (new) Team update

According to the message headers, Dr. Lee is using Thunderbird 3.0.4. =
Possibly a MTA or firewall issue?

On May 24, 2010, at 8:18 AM, Claudio Allocchio wrote:

>=20
>> At 18:59 23-05-10, Xiaodong Lee wrote:
>>> I try to reply two times, but it's a pity that I cannot send email =
to you email address with "+", so I send email to this list, is that a =
APP issues to be focused.
>>=20
>> I apologize for the email issue.  I'll send you an alternate email =
address off-list.
>>=20
>> It's the first time I come across a report of such an issue; =
excluding email address fields in web forms.  As there are two specific =
working groups (EAI and YAM) in the Apps Area, I would not label this as =
a general APPS issue.
>=20
> "messaging" hat on: it is really quite strange to come across such an =
issue, and just "now":
>=20
> local-part      =3D       dot-atom / quoted-string / obs-local-part
> dot-atom        =3D       [CFWS] dot-atom-text [CFWS]
> dot-atom-text   =3D       1*atext *("." 1*atext)
>=20
> and
>=20
> atext           =3D       ALPHA / DIGIT / ; Any character except =
controls,
>                        "!" / "#" /     ;  SP, and specials.
>                        "$" / "%" /     ;  Used for atoms
>                        "&" / "'" /
>                        "*" / "+" /
>                        "-" / "/" /
>                        "=3D" / "?" /
>                        "^" / "_" /
>                        "`" / "{" /
>                        "|" / "}" /
>                        "~"
>=20
> which client (not conforming to rfc2822) are you using?
>=20
> =
--------------------------------------------------------------------------=
----
> Claudio Allocchio             G   A   R   R          =
[email-masked]
>                        Senior Technical Officer
> tel: +39 040 3758523      Italian Academic and       G=3DClaudio; =
S=3DAllocchio;
> fax: +39 040 3758565        Research Network         P=3Dgarr; A=3Dgarr;=
 C=3Dit;
>=20
>           PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca
> _______________________________________________
> APPS-REVIEW mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review

Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 14:18:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Claudio Allocchio <[email-masked]>
To: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [APPS-REVIEW] Applications Area Review (new) Team update

> At 18:59 23-05-10, Xiaodong Lee wrote:
>> I try to reply two times, but it's a pity that I cannot send email to you 
>> email address with "+", so I send email to this list, is that a APP issues 
>> to be focused.
>
> I apologize for the email issue.  I'll send you an alternate email address 
> off-list.
>
> It's the first time I come across a report of such an issue; excluding email 
> address fields in web forms.  As there are two specific working groups (EAI 
> and YAM) in the Apps Area, I would not label this as a general APPS issue.

"messaging" hat on: it is really quite strange to come across such an 
issue, and just "now":

local-part      =       dot-atom / quoted-string / obs-local-part
dot-atom        =       [CFWS] dot-atom-text [CFWS]
dot-atom-text   =       1*atext *("." 1*atext)

and

atext           =       ALPHA / DIGIT / ; Any character except controls,
                         "!" / "#" /     ;  SP, and specials.
                         "$" / "%" /     ;  Used for atoms
                         "&" / "'" /
                         "*" / "+" /
                         "-" / "/" /
                         "=" / "?" /
                         "^" / "_" /
                         "`" / "{" /
                         "|" / "}" /
                         "~"

which client (not conforming to rfc2822) are you using?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Claudio Allocchio             G   A   R   R          [email-masked]
                         Senior Technical Officer
tel: +39 040 3758523      Italian Academic and       G=Claudio; S=Allocchio;
fax: +39 040 3758565        Research Network         P=garr; A=garr; C=it;

            PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca

Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 04:51:47 -0700
To: [email-masked]
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [APPS-REVIEW] Applications Area Review (new) Team update

Hi Xiaodong,

Thank you for participating.

At 18:59 23-05-10, Xiaodong Lee wrote:
>I try to reply two times, but it's a pity that I cannot send email 
>to you email address with "+", so I send email to this list, is that 
>a APP issues to be focused.

I apologize for the email issue.  I'll send you an alternate email 
address off-list.

It's the first time I come across a report of such an issue; 
excluding email address fields in web forms.  As there are two 
specific working groups (EAI and YAM) in the Apps Area, I would not 
label this as a general APPS issue.

If there are any issues sending me an email, please post a message to 
this mailing list.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy 

Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 09:59:26 +0800
From: Xiaodong Lee <[email-masked]>
Organization: CNNIC
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [APPS-REVIEW] Applications Area Review (new) Team update
Reply-To: [email-masked]

I try to reply two times, but it's a pity that I cannot send email to 
you email address with "+", so I send email to this list, is that a APP 
issues to be focused.

Regards,
Xiaodong Lee

On 2010-5-20 1:29, SM wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Eric Burger is an IAOC member.  He will not asked to perform any 
> review until further notice due to workload.  I have not updated the 
> Apps-area webpage yet as I don't have access to it.
>
> I have not received any reply from the following members:
>
>  Harald Alvestrand
>  Cyrus Daboo
>  Reinhold Kainhofer
>  Yves Lafon
>  Xiaodong Lee
>  Barry Leiba
>  Chris Newman
>  Thomas Roessler
>
> The Applications Area Review (new) Team needs all the experience and 
> expertise it can get.  Please contact me to confirm your participation.
>
> Alexey mentioned that he is interested in comments about:
>
>  ABNF
>  Date/time
>  Error handling
>  Extensibility
>  Internationalization
>  Use  of XML/XML schema
>  Use of URIs, etc.
>
> This is not the complete list of issues to look out for.  Alexey and 
> Peter will provide a list of typical Apps Area issues so that we have 
> a better idea of what to look for.
>
> The main objective of the team is to assist the Apps Area Directors.  
> Reviews will be per-Apps AD request.  The team will also accept 
> requests from authors to review their drafts.  That will generally be 
> documents in IETF Last Call.
>
> Some of you offered to help beyond what was asked for.  I really 
> appreciate that and I will take up your offer.
>
> Best regards,
> -sm
>
> _______________________________________________
> APPS-REVIEW mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review
>

Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 10:29:23 -0700
To: [email-masked]
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Subject: [APPS-REVIEW] Applications Area Review (new) Team update

Hello,

Eric Burger is an IAOC member.  He will not asked to perform any 
review until further notice due to workload.  I have not updated the 
Apps-area webpage yet as I don't have access to it.

I have not received any reply from the following members:

  Harald Alvestrand
  Cyrus Daboo
  Reinhold Kainhofer
  Yves Lafon
  Xiaodong Lee
  Barry Leiba
  Chris Newman
  Thomas Roessler

The Applications Area Review (new) Team needs all the experience and 
expertise it can get.  Please contact me to confirm your participation.

Alexey mentioned that he is interested in comments about:

  ABNF
  Date/time
  Error handling
  Extensibility
  Internationalization
  Use  of XML/XML schema
  Use of URIs, etc.

This is not the complete list of issues to look out for.  Alexey and 
Peter will provide a list of typical Apps Area issues so that we have 
a better idea of what to look for.

The main objective of the team is to assist the Apps Area 
Directors.  Reviews will be per-Apps AD request.  The team will also 
accept requests from authors to review their drafts.  That will 
generally be documents in IETF Last Call.

Some of you offered to help beyond what was asked for.  I really 
appreciate that and I will take up your offer.

Best regards,
-sm

Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 08:38:10 -0700
To: Mark Baker <[email-masked]>
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [APPS-REVIEW] Request for review of draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-map-05.txt

Hi Mark,

Alexey requested a review of=20
draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-map-05 (=20
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-map-05=20
).  As there aren't any team members who listed=20
DSDL expertise, I'll identify the members of the=20
Applications Area Review Team with XML expertise:

  1. Mark Baker
  2. Joshua Bell
  3. Marc Blanchet
  4. Martin D=FCrst
  5. Joe Hildebrand
  6. Scott Lawrence (on leave)
  7. Mark Nottingham
  8. Julian Reschke

The request is being assigned to you as you are=20
currently at the top of the list.  You can find=20
information about the author and WG in the=20
datatracker (=20
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-map/=20
).  Previous reviews from the Apps-review Team=20
are accessible at http://www.apps.ietf.org/content/apps-review-template

The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the=20
author, WG Chair and document shepherd, if=20
applicable.  The subject of the email when=20
submitting the review should be "apps-team review=20
of draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-map-05".

Thanks,
-sm

Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 04:21:37 -0700
To: [email-masked]
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Subject: [APPS-REVIEW] Applications Area Review (new) Team

Dear Applications Area Review Team,

There are currently 33 members listed as part of the Applications 
Area Review Team.  We have the two Application Area Directors, one 
IAB member and an outgoing Application Area Directors.  I suggest 
using the following guidelines:

  1. IESG members are placed on leave.  As the team is there to 
assist the two Application Area Directors, that excludes the them 
from performing reviews.

  2. Outgoing IESG members are placed on leave until the next two 
IETF meetings as they need a vacation.

  3. IAB and IAOC members are placed on leave if they have a heavy 
IETF workload.

Most of you are also Working Group Chairs and/or RFC authors and you 
are quite busy.  I would like to thank you for volunteering for the 
Applications Area Review Team.  The team relies on your participation 
to get the work done.

I sent an email to every Applications Area Review Team member.  If 
you have not received the email, please contact me at 
[email-masked].  The list of members for the Applications Area 
Review (new) Team will be drawn from those people who have explicitly 
agreed to participate.  I encourage everyone to do so as the team 
needs your expertise.

I received 12 replies up to now.  A team member pointed out that we 
could adopt a criteria to ensure a distributed and thus neutral 
review of I-Ds.  If you have any idea on how it should be done, I am 
open to advice.

There may be two types of requests for reviews.  The first type might 
be for an I-D that is scheduled for the next IESG telechat while the 
second type might be a request from the author, for example.  For the 
first type, the request might be received on the Thursday preceding 
the IESG telechat.  As far as possible, please submit your review 
before the following Tuesday evening.  The deadline for the second 
type is one week.  If you need more time, please contact me as soon 
as possible.

There may be requests for reviews that require more than one area of 
expertise.  The review can be split into two or more parts if the 
reviewer requests it.  At times, a reviewer may wish to collaborate 
informally with another member of the team to perform a review.  If 
you would like to discuss about a review with the team, feel free to 
use the apps-review mailing list.

A template for the review is available at 
http://www.apps.ietf.org/content/apps-review-template  All reviews 
should be sent to apps-discuss, the author, WG Chair and document 
shepherd.  You can search for that information at 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/ The subject of the email when 
submitting the review should be "apps-team review of draft-name".

The reviewer with the required expertise is chosen in alphabetical 
order sorted by last name from the list available at 
http://www.apps.ietf.org/content/applications-area-review-team  The 
next reviewer in line is chosen if the need arises, i.e. neutral 
reviews.  If I did not identify the desired expertise for the 
request, please point it out.  It is appropriate to do so on the 
apps-review mailing list.

Some of you might be on vacation or changing jobs.  Please notify me 
in advance so that I can assign the review to another member of the 
team.  Presently, it is not possible for me to estimate the number of 
reviews we may have to do.  I hope to be able to come up with an 
answer within a few months.  Meanwhile, we could aim to keep that to 
not more than one review a month.  If that threshold is reached, I 
will need your help to add more members to the team.

Scott Lawrence will not be assigned any review until the next IETF 
meeting.  Lisa Dusseault will not be asked to perform any review 
until the IETF meeting this year.  As John Klensin is on the IAB, I 
won't ask him to perform any review until further notice.

Alexey Melnikov and Peter Saint-Andre are the current Application 
Area Directors.  You can contact them if there are any issues with 
the work of the Applications Area Review Team or with the undersigned.

If you have any comments about the above, please post them to the 
mailing list or email me.  Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 11:05:07 -0700
To: [email-masked]
From: SM <[email-masked]>
Subject: [APPS-REVIEW] Applications Area Review Team update

Dear Applications Area Review Team,

Due to parsimonious bandwidth, I will keep this short.  As you are 
aware, the Applications Area Review Team provides semi-formal reviews 
of Internet-Drafts as a way to improve the quality of IETF 
specifications.  Peter Saint-Andre devised a template for reviews and 
some procedures during his tenure as Apps Review Team Leader.  I 
won't suggest any change to that.

I will send each of you an email next week to verify whether the area 
of expertise listed on the Applications Area Review Team is correct.

Currently, a request for review is posted to the mailing list and 
people volunteer.  I propose to change that, if the team agrees, to 
spread the workload.  The reviewer with the required expertise is 
chosen in alphabetical order.  If the team member is busy or on 
vacation, the next person in line will be asked to perform the 
review.  Please feel free to decline if I did not choose the correct 
expertise required for the review.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 21:24:25 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [APPS-REVIEW] Looking for a new Apps Review Team Leader

Alexey Melnikov wrote:

> Peter and I are looking for a new Apps Area Review Team Leader. The 
> main task of the Team Leader is to find suitable reviewers from the 
> apps-review team and to make sure that reviews are done in a timely 
> manner.
>
> If you are interested, please reply directly to Peter and myself.
>
> Alexey, as Apps ADs.

After discussing people who volunteered, Peter and I are happy to 
announce that SM <[email-masked]> agreed to serve the Apps Review 
Team Leader.
Thank you, SM!

Peter and Alexey.

Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 19:24:12 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Subject: [APPS-REVIEW] Request for review of draft-ietf-netmod-dsdl-map-05.txt

Peter and I just received a request for Apps review of this document. 
Can anybody with DSDL experience please review this?

Thanks,
Alexey

Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 19:01:39 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked], [email-masked]
Subject: [APPS-REVIEW] Looking for a new Apps Review Team Leader

Peter and I are looking for a new Apps Area Review Team Leader. The main 
task of the Team Leader is to find suitable reviewers from the 
apps-review team and to make sure that reviews are done in a timely manner.

If you are interested, please reply directly to Peter and myself.

Alexey, as Apps ADs.