The timecaf storage manager is like the timehash storage manager, except that
it stores multiple articles in one file.  The file format is called CAF
(for "crunched article file", putting multiple articles together into one big
file), and uses a library 'caf.c' dating back from the pre-storage manager 
days when I made a locally-hacked version of INN1.5 that used this
code in order to boost performance on my system.  Originally I had planned to
do one big file per newsgroup, but it turns out that a time-based file layout
rather than newsgroup-name-based is a. more efficient and b. much easier to
fit into the current storage manager interface paradigm.  Anyway, the 
pathnames for the files are of the form
	<patharticles>/timecaf-nn/bb/aacc.CF
where 'nn' is the numeric storage class (same as in 'timehash') and the
file contains all articles written during the interval from 
(time_t) 0xaabbcc00 to 0xaabbccFF.  

  The way expiration works on the 'timecaf' storage manager is a bit
complicated.  When articles are expired or cancelled (via SMcancel())
they are at first just marked as expired in the .CF file -- no actual
disk space is freed at first.  But if fastrm/SMcancel() notices that a
certain amount of space has been marked as free, then it will do a
sort of garbage collection pass on the file, writing out a new file
containing only the articles from the old file that have not yet
expired and removing the old file.  If fastrm notices that *all* the
articles in a file have been expired, it just deletes the file and
doesn't create a new one.  This means that if your setup has
newsgroups with differing expiration lengths put in the same timecaf
storage class, everything will work ok but your expire runs will spend
some extra time copying files about.  In my experience this hasn't been too
much of a problem.  If you find that it is a problem, you may wish to 
consider dividing up your spool layout so each storage class gets newsgroups
that expire at more-or-less the same time, or putting *.binaries in their own
storage class.

Some advantages and disadvantages compared to the 'timehash' and
'CNFS' storage methods:

  timecaf is somewhat faster than timehash in writing articles (the tests
I did on the old news.ecn.uoknor.edu showed a roughly 4x improvement in
artwrite speed).  This is presumably due to improved locality of reference and
not having to open/close article files all the time but only every 4 minutes or
so.  Artcancel speed, on the other hand, is not much different, because
cancel requests have terrible locality of reference.   Expire times seem
to be generally somewhat faster than timehash as well, even given the 
extra copying overhead mentioned above.

  Timecaf is probably slower than CNFS, but I haven't had a chance
to do any comparison tests.  Timecaf does share the feature with timehash
that you can get much more fine-tuned control of your expire times (on a 
group-by-group basis, if needed) than you can with CNFS.  

Down below is an old README telling more about the implementation details
of the CAF file format.  Most people won't care about this, but if you're
curious, read on; it also tells some of the historical developments that
went on in this code.  I've been running some version of this code off and
on for the past two years, and have been running it as a storage manager
module for the past few months, so I'm pretty sure of it's stability.

			Richard Todd
	(rmtodd@mailhost.ecn.ou.edu/rmtodd@servalan.servalan.com)


Implementation details (format of a CAF file) and some design rationale:

 Look at include/caf.h for the details, but basically, the layout is
something like this.  Each CAF file has a blocksize associated with it
(usually 512 bytes, but it can vary).  The layout of a CAF file is as
follows:
  1.	Header (~52 bytes) containing information like low and high
article numbers, amount of free space, blocksize.  
  2.	Free space bitmap (size given by the FreeZoneTabSize field of the
header).
  3.	CAFTOCENTs (CAF Table of Contents Entries), 1/article storable
in the file.  Each CAFTOCENT gives the article's size, creation time,
and offset in the CAF file.  Usually space is alloted in the CAF file
for 64K CAFTOCENTs, even if the # of articles in the CAF file is
nowhere near that amount.  The unused CAFTOCENTs are all zeros, and
this means CAF files are almost always sparse.
  4.	Articles, always stored starting at blocksize boundaries. 

When fastrm is told to remove an article, the article is not actually
removed as such, it is merely marked as non-existent (the CAFTOCENT is
zeroed), and the blocks taken up by the article are marked as 'free'
in the free space bitmap.  When innd writes an article to a CAF file,
it first looks to see if the CAF file has any free blocks in a
contiguous chunk large enough to handle the article, and if so writes
the article into those blocks and marks those blocks as being in use.
If there is no suitable free space chunk in the CAF file, then innd
merely appends the article to the end of the CAF file and records the
article's position in the TOC. [Given the way the CAF code is currently
used by the timecaf storage manager, it's almost always the case that we're
appending to the end of the file.] 

   A note on the free bitmap portion of the CAF file: it's not just a simple
bitmap (each bit of the bitmap tells whether a data block is in use or free.)
First there is an 'index' bitmap which tells which blocks of the 'main' bitmap
have free blocks listed in them, and then a 'main' bitmap which tells whether
the data blocks are in use or free.  This setup means that we can have 
bitmaps for CAF files as large as 8GB, while still being able to find free
space by only reading the 'index' bitmap and one block of the 'main' bitmap.
(Previous versions of the CAF code had just a 'main' bitmap and scaled the 
blocksize up when CAF files got large; this became rather, um, non-optimal
when control.cancel started to hit hundreds of thousands of articles and 8K
blocksizes.)  In practice, CAF files over 2GB or 4GB may be a problem because
of unsigned/signed long problems, and ones over 4G are probably impossible 
on anything besides an Alpha unless you track down all the places in innd
where they assume off_t is a long and fix it to work with long longs.  

  At some point I'd also like to try some other, more efficient
directory layout for the CAF files, as opposed to the old 
/var/spool/news/newsgroup/name/component/ scheme.  At the time I
started implementing this, it seemed like it'd be too much of a hassle
to change this in INN as it stands.  I'm hoping that changing this
assumption (that newsgroup a.b.c is always in directory a/b/c) will be
easier once INN acquires a nice interface for specifying alternate
storage managers.  [It is and it isn't; as I said, we've currently abandoned
all relationship between newsgroup names and CAF file names, which
provided a sizable jump in performance.  Before that, I had changed the code
so that the CAF file for, e.g.,
alt.tv.babylon-5 will now be /var/spool/news/alt/tv/babylon-5.CF -- note the
final . instead of a /.  This pretty much bypasses the need for the 'terminal'
layer of directories to be read, and means that these directory blocks will not
be fighting with other blocks for the limited space available in the buffer 
cache.   This provides more of an improvement than you might think; thruput on 
news.ecn.uoknor.edu went from 160,000 articles/day to >200,000 articles/day
with this patch, and this is on an aging 32M 486/66.]
